Cracking RSA with Fewer Qubits: What Google's New Quantum Factoring Estimate Means for Cybersecurity

Cracking RSA with Fewer Qubits: What Google's New Quantum Factoring Estimate Means for Cybersecurity

May 28, 2025

Last week, Craig Gidney from Google Quantum AI published a breakthrough study that redefines the landscape of cryptographic security. His paper, “How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits”, dramatically lowers the estimated quantum resources needed to break RSA-2048—one of the most widely used encryption standards securing everything from email to financial transactions to government databases.

Where previous estimates (including Gidney’s own 2019 study) projected that cracking RSA-2048 would require around 20 million qubits and 8 hours of computation, the new analysis reveals that it could be done in under a week using fewer than 1 million noisy qubits. This reduction of more than 95% in hardware requirements is a seismic shift in the projected timeline for “Q-Day”—the hypothetical moment when quantum computers can break modern encryption.

Read QuantumGenie's other industry insights.

What Makes RSA-2048 Vulnerable?

RSA encryption is based on the mathematical challenge of factoring large numbers into their prime components—a task that classical computers find prohibitively difficult at the 2048-bit level. This difficulty forms the backbone of digital security protocols used in secure web browsing (HTTPS), email encryption (PGP), VPNs, and many blockchain systems.

Quantum computers, however, can use Shor’s algorithm to factor these numbers exponentially faster. The catch? That algorithm requires high-fidelity quantum gates, large-scale error correction, and millions of qubits—until now.

Google’s Innovation: Shrinking the Qubit Budget

Gidney’s 2025 paper showcases several technical innovations that slash the qubit requirements for factoring RSA-2048:

  • Approximate Residue Arithmetic: This method, recently introduced by Chevignard, Fouque, and Schrottenloher (2024), streamlines modular arithmetic and reduces the depth of quantum circuits needed for number factoring.

  • Magic State Cultivation: A more space-efficient way of producing non-Clifford gate resources (known as magic states), crucial for enabling universal quantum computation under error correction.

  • Optimized Period Finding with Ekerå-Håstad Algorithms: These advanced number-theoretic optimizations allow for a more efficient implementation of the quantum part of Shor’s algorithm.

  • Yoked Surface Codes & Sparse Lookups: Techniques that minimize the overhead in fault-tolerant quantum circuits, enabling better scaling.

Collectively, these improvements reduce the physical qubit requirement to under 1 million and allow the algorithm to complete in less than 7 days, given favorable assumptions like a 0.1% gate error rate and a 1-microsecond surface code cycle time.

This represents a ~20x reduction in required qubits and vastly improves the practical feasibility of quantum attacks on RSA.

Read QuantumGenie's other industry insights.

Implications for Cryptographic Security

The broader takeaway is stark: RSA-2048 is no longer as safe as once believed.

While building a quantum computer capable of executing this attack is still a monumental engineering challenge, the new resource estimates bring that future much closer. If quantum hardware continues to progress as expected—with leading players like IBM, Google, and startups like Quantinuum and PsiQuantum scaling up both qubit numbers and error rates—Q-Day could realistically occur within 10 to 15 years, or sooner in a best-case scenario.

That means data encrypted today could be vulnerable tomorrow—especially for governments, banks, healthcare institutions, and cloud service providers that store data with long-term confidentiality requirements.

This underscores the risk of “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks, in which threat actors (including nation-states) are believed to be storing encrypted traffic now, anticipating that they’ll be able to decrypt it once quantum systems mature.

Read QuantumGenie's other industry insights.

Urgency for Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)

The cryptographic community has been preparing for this scenario for several years. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has already finalized the first suite of post-quantum encryption standards, including lattice-based algorithms like CRYSTALS-Kyber and Dilithium, which are believed to be resistant to quantum attacks.

Yet, many systems—particularly in legacy environments—still depend on RSA-2048 or similar classical algorithms. Migrating these systems takes time, and in some cases, the encrypted data will need to remain secure for decades. That’s why Gidney’s paper acts as both a technical milestone and a public warning.

Organizations must start:

  • Inventorying existing cryptographic systems and identifying where RSA is used.

  • Deploying hybrid encryption (combining classical and quantum-resistant algorithms).

  • Adopting crypto-agility strategies to enable rapid algorithm updates in the future.

  • Educating stakeholders and regulators about the urgency of quantum readiness.

Read QuantumGenie's other industry insights.

Conclusion: The Countdown Is Real

Google’s 2025 quantum factoring estimate is more than a mathematical triumph—it’s a wake-up call. RSA-2048 has long been considered a gold standard in security, but this research makes clear that its lifespan is rapidly approaching an end.

The clock is ticking. And for the cybersecurity world, there’s no time to waste.

Reference:
Gidney, C. (2025). How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits. Google Quantum AI. arXiv:2505.15917.

Need help evaluating your organization’s quantum risk exposure or building a migration roadmap? I can help design a tailored post-quantum strategy.

May 28, 2025

Quantum Insights

The 2025 Retail Cyberstorm: How Post-Quantum Cryptography Could Have Prevented Major Breaches

May 29, 2025

Microsoft’s Quantum Leap: Inside the Majorana Chip That Could Revolutionize Computing

May 29, 2025

Should Post-Quantum Cryptography Start Now? The Clock Is Ticking

May 28, 2025

Cracking RSA with Fewer Qubits: What Google's New Quantum Factoring Estimate Means for Cybersecurity

May 28, 2025

Quantum Arms Race: U.S. Defense Intelligence Flags Rivals’ Growing Military Use of Quantum Tech

May 27, 2025

Quantum Threats and Bitcoin: Why BlackRock’s Warning Matters for the Future of Crypto Security

May 27, 2025

Sudbury's SNOLAB Ventures into Quantum Computing Research

May 26, 2025

Lockheed Martin and IBM Pioneer Quantum-Classical Hybrid Computing for Complex Molecular Simulations

May 23, 2025

Why the Moon Matters for Quantum Computing: From Helium-3 to Off-Planet Quantum Networks

May 23, 2025

NIST Approves Three Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards: A Milestone for Digital Security

May 22, 2025

Scientists Connect Quantum Processors via Fiber Optic Cable for the First Time

May 21, 2025

Quantum Computing and Encryption Breakthroughs in 2025: A New Era of Innovation

May 21, 2025

How CISOs Can Defend Against the “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later” Threat

May 20, 2025

NVIDIA Expands Quantum and AI Ecosystem in Taiwan Through Strategic Partnerships and Supercomputing Initiatives

May 19, 2025

Quantum Annealing Breakthrough: Quantum Computer Outperforms Fastest Supercomputers

May 18, 2025

Quantum Computing's New Frontier: How the $1.4 Trillion US–UAE Investment Deal is Shaping the Industry

May 16, 2025

Quantum Computing Meets Cancer Research: A New Frontier in Drug Discovery

May 16, 2025

Quantum Industry Leaders Urge Congress to Reauthorize and Expand National Quantum Initiative

May 15, 2025

Honeywell's Quantinuum and Qatar's Al Rabban Capital Forge $1 Billion Quantum Computing Joint Venture

May 15, 2025

Advancing Quantum Machine Learning with Multi-Chip Ensemble Architectures

May 14, 2025

How will the new US-Saudi Arabia AI deal effect the Quantum Computing industry?

May 14, 2025

Saudi Arabia's $600 Billion AI Push: Amazon, Nvidia, and Global Tech Giants Lead the Charge

May 14, 2025

Quantum Computing Breakthrough: Diamond Qubits Achieve Unprecedented Precision

Apr 28, 2025

Australia’s Quantum Cryptography Roadmap: Preparing for a Post-Quantum Future

Apr 26, 2025

Green Fern
Green Fern
Green Fern

Harvest Now, Decrypt later

Apr 25, 2025

Yellow Flower
Yellow Flower
Yellow Flower

NIST’s New Quantum Cryptography Standards: What You Need to Know

Apr 25, 2025

Read our latest commentary and research on the post-quantum encryption space

Read our latest commentary and research on the post-quantum encryption space

Last week, Craig Gidney from Google Quantum AI published a breakthrough study that redefines the landscape of cryptographic security. His paper, “How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits”, dramatically lowers the estimated quantum resources needed to break RSA-2048—one of the most widely used encryption standards securing everything from email to financial transactions to government databases.

Where previous estimates (including Gidney’s own 2019 study) projected that cracking RSA-2048 would require around 20 million qubits and 8 hours of computation, the new analysis reveals that it could be done in under a week using fewer than 1 million noisy qubits. This reduction of more than 95% in hardware requirements is a seismic shift in the projected timeline for “Q-Day”—the hypothetical moment when quantum computers can break modern encryption.

Read QuantumGenie's other industry insights.

What Makes RSA-2048 Vulnerable?

RSA encryption is based on the mathematical challenge of factoring large numbers into their prime components—a task that classical computers find prohibitively difficult at the 2048-bit level. This difficulty forms the backbone of digital security protocols used in secure web browsing (HTTPS), email encryption (PGP), VPNs, and many blockchain systems.

Quantum computers, however, can use Shor’s algorithm to factor these numbers exponentially faster. The catch? That algorithm requires high-fidelity quantum gates, large-scale error correction, and millions of qubits—until now.

Google’s Innovation: Shrinking the Qubit Budget

Gidney’s 2025 paper showcases several technical innovations that slash the qubit requirements for factoring RSA-2048:

  • Approximate Residue Arithmetic: This method, recently introduced by Chevignard, Fouque, and Schrottenloher (2024), streamlines modular arithmetic and reduces the depth of quantum circuits needed for number factoring.

  • Magic State Cultivation: A more space-efficient way of producing non-Clifford gate resources (known as magic states), crucial for enabling universal quantum computation under error correction.

  • Optimized Period Finding with Ekerå-Håstad Algorithms: These advanced number-theoretic optimizations allow for a more efficient implementation of the quantum part of Shor’s algorithm.

  • Yoked Surface Codes & Sparse Lookups: Techniques that minimize the overhead in fault-tolerant quantum circuits, enabling better scaling.

Collectively, these improvements reduce the physical qubit requirement to under 1 million and allow the algorithm to complete in less than 7 days, given favorable assumptions like a 0.1% gate error rate and a 1-microsecond surface code cycle time.

This represents a ~20x reduction in required qubits and vastly improves the practical feasibility of quantum attacks on RSA.

Read QuantumGenie's other industry insights.

Implications for Cryptographic Security

The broader takeaway is stark: RSA-2048 is no longer as safe as once believed.

While building a quantum computer capable of executing this attack is still a monumental engineering challenge, the new resource estimates bring that future much closer. If quantum hardware continues to progress as expected—with leading players like IBM, Google, and startups like Quantinuum and PsiQuantum scaling up both qubit numbers and error rates—Q-Day could realistically occur within 10 to 15 years, or sooner in a best-case scenario.

That means data encrypted today could be vulnerable tomorrow—especially for governments, banks, healthcare institutions, and cloud service providers that store data with long-term confidentiality requirements.

This underscores the risk of “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks, in which threat actors (including nation-states) are believed to be storing encrypted traffic now, anticipating that they’ll be able to decrypt it once quantum systems mature.

Read QuantumGenie's other industry insights.

Urgency for Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)

The cryptographic community has been preparing for this scenario for several years. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has already finalized the first suite of post-quantum encryption standards, including lattice-based algorithms like CRYSTALS-Kyber and Dilithium, which are believed to be resistant to quantum attacks.

Yet, many systems—particularly in legacy environments—still depend on RSA-2048 or similar classical algorithms. Migrating these systems takes time, and in some cases, the encrypted data will need to remain secure for decades. That’s why Gidney’s paper acts as both a technical milestone and a public warning.

Organizations must start:

  • Inventorying existing cryptographic systems and identifying where RSA is used.

  • Deploying hybrid encryption (combining classical and quantum-resistant algorithms).

  • Adopting crypto-agility strategies to enable rapid algorithm updates in the future.

  • Educating stakeholders and regulators about the urgency of quantum readiness.

Read QuantumGenie's other industry insights.

Conclusion: The Countdown Is Real

Google’s 2025 quantum factoring estimate is more than a mathematical triumph—it’s a wake-up call. RSA-2048 has long been considered a gold standard in security, but this research makes clear that its lifespan is rapidly approaching an end.

The clock is ticking. And for the cybersecurity world, there’s no time to waste.

Reference:
Gidney, C. (2025). How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits. Google Quantum AI. arXiv:2505.15917.

Need help evaluating your organization’s quantum risk exposure or building a migration roadmap? I can help design a tailored post-quantum strategy.

Let's talk!

Office:

1535 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
USA

Local time:

03:05:49

Let's talk!

Office:

1535 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
USA

Local time:

03:05:49